On Aug 11, 9:02 am, Chouser wrote:
> Have you sent in your CA?
It's in the capable hands of the USPS.
Joe
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> Ticket and patch welcome!
Done and done: https://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/tickets/422
--Chouser
http://joyofclojure.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to thi
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:09 PM, joegg wrote:
>
> This fixes the behavior we're seeing, but, ummm... might break other
> things, I suppose. The tests I've written don't cover all the
> expected behavior of try/catch/finally.
You wrote some nice tests for these that could be included in
clojure-t
You guys are awesome! Less than 24 hour turnaround.
On Aug 10, 1:09 pm, Chouser wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Chouser wrote:
>
> > That patch seems to essentially reverse this one:
>
> >http://github.com/clojure/clojure/commit/5e9f2b293b307aa7953cd390360d...
>
> > ...which suggests
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Chouser wrote:
>
> That patch seems to essentially reverse this one:
>
> http://github.com/clojure/clojure/commit/5e9f2b293b307aa7953cd390360d24549e542b92
>
> ...which suggests to me there must be a better solution, though I
> don't see yet what it would be.
Ok, i
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:09 PM, joegg wrote:
> diff --git a/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.java b/src/jvm/clojure/lang/
> Compiler.java
> index f5684f1..af55660 100644
> --- a/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.java
> +++ b/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.java
> @@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@ public static class
diff --git a/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.java b/src/jvm/clojure/lang/
Compiler.java
index f5684f1..af55660 100644
--- a/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.java
+++ b/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.java
@@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@ public static class TryExpr implements Expr{
gen.visitT
Laurent,
Looking through the output of javap -v, it looks to me like this is
roughly what's been emitted (please forgive the mix of clojure and
java):
try {
(prn :test)
(swap! a inc)
(.foo nil)
} finally {
(swap! a inc)
(.foo nil)
}
Which explains why @a is 3 -- I'm not sure this is in
Weird indeed:
user=> (def a (atom 1))
#'user/a
user=> (try (prn :test) (finally (swap! a inc) (.foo nil)))
:test
java.lang.NullPointerException (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)
user=> @a
3
I would have expected 2 as a result, in any case ?
2010/8/10 Meikel Brandmeyer
> Hi,
>
> On Aug 10, 8:36 am, Brian Stil
Hi Brian,
System/out
#
(System/out)
#
both return the "out" PrintStream object, so
(.. System/out (print "-"))
-nil
(.. (System/out) (print "-"))
-nil
(.. System/out (print "-"))
-nil
all invoke the print method on the java PrintStream object and
correctly return nil
as does...
(.print System/o
The bug has nothing to do with try-finally.
Take a look at the macro expansion:
user=> (macroexpand '(.. (System/out) (print "-") (println "-")))
(. (. (System/out) (print "-")) (println "-"))
You are trying to call 'println on what ever 'print returns. But
'print is a void method.
On Tue, Aug
Hi,
On Aug 10, 8:36 am, Brian Stiles wrote:
> The following succeeds:
>
> (try
> (prn 1)
> (finally
> (prn 2)
> (doto (System/out) (.print "-") (.println "-"
>
> prints:
>
> 1
> 2
> --
>
> The following fails (note the odd duplication of "2" in the output):
>
> (try
> (prn 1)
>
The following succeeds:
(try
(prn 1)
(finally
(prn 2)
(doto (System/out) (.print "-") (.println "-"
prints:
1
2
--
The following fails (note the odd duplication of "2" in the output):
(try
(prn 1)
(finally
(prn 2)
(.. (System/out) (print "-") (println "-"
prints:
13 matches
Mail list logo
