On Feb 14, 9:13 pm, "Stephen C. Gilardi" wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2009, at 11:10 PM, Chouser wrote:
>
> > I don't think that's quite right. I don't think it matters in this
> > case, but hash values aren't guaranteed unique. A hash-map can have
> > two keys with the same hash value as long as = retu
It is making more sense now.
One other interesting thing that surprised me is: "There is not a
total ordering across types."
See discussion:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/710848919c68981f/51ede18b2fd7ab96?lnk=gst&q=sorted-set#51ede18b2fd7ab96
Therefore things like (so
On Feb 14, 11:10 pm, Chouser wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
>
>
>
> > "set" is a hash set. It will never contain two items with equal hashes.
>
> I don't think that's quite right. I don't think it matters in this
> case, but hash values aren't guaranteed u
On Feb 14, 2009, at 11:10 PM, Chouser wrote:
I don't think that's quite right. I don't think it matters in this
case, but hash values aren't guaranteed unique. A hash-map can have
two keys with the same hash value as long as = returns false. Vectors
and lists with the same values evaluate as
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
>
> "set" is a hash set. It will never contain two items with equal hashes.
I don't think that's quite right. I don't think it matters in this
case, but hash values aren't guaranteed unique. A hash-map can have
two keys with the same h
On Feb 14, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Frantisek Sodomka wrote:
Function 'set' looses some of its data. It seems that there is a
problem with comparison between lists and vectors:
"set" is a hash set. It will never contain two items with equal hashes.
user=> (hash [1 2])
994
us
Similar is:
user=> #{[] ()}
#{[]}
user=> #{[] [1 2]}
#{[] [1 2]}
user=> (hash-set [] ())
#{[]}
Frantisek
On Feb 15, 12:38 am, Frantisek Sodomka wrote:
> Hello!
> Function 'set' looses some of its data. It seems that there is a
> problem with comparison between lists and vectors:
>
> user=> (cou
Hello!
Function 'set' looses some of its data. It seems that there is a
problem with comparison between lists and vectors:
user=> (count [nil false true 0 42 0.0 3.14 2/3 0M 1M \c "" "abc"
'sym :kw () '(1 2) [] [1 2] {} {:a 1 :b 2} #{} #{1 2}])
23
user=> (set [nil false true 0 42 0.0 3.14 2/3 0M
