On Friday, July 12, 2013 12:01:08 AM UTC+2, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Vincent vhenn...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I guess I can proxy APersistentVector, but the Clojure docs [1] advise
to
use reify in favour to proxy whenever possible. My goal is to have
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Vincent vhenneb...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I can proxy APersistentVector, but the Clojure docs [1] advise to
use reify in favour to proxy whenever possible. My goal is to have my byte
stream behave like a standard Clojure vector.
Given the definition of
I guess I can proxy APersistentVector, but the Clojure docs [1] advise to
use reify in favour to proxy whenever possible. My goal is to have my byte
stream behave like a standard Clojure vector. (Parts of that stream also
represent maps, and I'd like to do the same without loading them into
If Clojure's code assumes IPersistentVectors to be Collections, why doesn't
IPersistentVector extend Collection? I'd consider that to be a bug.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Vincent vhenneb...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I can proxy APersistentVector, but the Clojure docs [1] advise to
use
For reference, here's another vector implementation:
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/clj/clojure/gvec.clj
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com wrote:
If Clojure's code assumes IPersistentVectors to be Collections, why
doesn't IPersistentVector
Hello,
Suppose I have a byte array representing an array of integers:
$ clojure-repl
Clojure 1.5.1
user= (def v
(let [a (byte-array (map byte [0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3]))]
(reify clojure.lang.IPersistentVector
clojure.lang.Seqable
(seq [_] (for [i (range 0 (alength a) 2)]
From the lack of extending java's Collection in IPersistentVector or
associated interfaces, it seems like the intent is for every implementation
to extend (proxy) APersistentVector. Is that sufficient for what you're
trying to do? None of the methods in there are final.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at
