There's nothing wrong with getting deliberately loaded.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 27, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Stuart Sierra
> wrote:
>> *I* value most of these things, but I'm not going to try to speak for anyone
>> else. I've learned that le
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
> *I* value most of these things, but I'm not going to try to speak for anyone
> else. I've learned that lesson the hard way.
And I think the questions are deliberately loaded :)
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- htt
...@puredanger.com wrote:
> If you have trouble viewing or submitting this form, you can fill it out
> online:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFpleU1QbVRyLWVX...
>
> Clojure Community Values
>
> For no particular reason I got to thinking about things the Clojure
>
I appreciate the intent, Alex, but I am reluctant to say what "we" value,
since "we" on this list alone is nearly six thousand people.
*I* value most of these things, but I'm not going to try to speak for
anyone else. I've learned that lesson the hard way.
-S
--
You received this message beca
Bug report: there's no "don't know", "can't decide", or "they're
equal" type of option. And it won't let you leave any blank either.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note tha
If you have trouble viewing or submitting this form, you can fill it out
online:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFpleU1QbVRyLWVXVElRMmJpQlpoYWc6MQ
Clojure Community Values
For no particular reason I got to thinking about things the Clojure
community values in the
