On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 11:35:34 PM UTC+3, Sergey Didenko wrote:
>
> Sorry if that was already answered,
>
> Is there a possibility to get rid of this legalwall?
>
>
Interestingly, node.js has just done that
today: http://www.joyent.com/blog/broadening-node-js-contributions
Ustun
>
--
Y
I look at it from the psychological point of view.
There is a similar design decision in a website world - mandatory login vs
relaxed login. For years a lot of webmasters were quite inert to even look
at possibility to relax login requirement for core site activities.
However in the online shoppi
Excuse my ignorance. But from what I've read, it all seems fair game.
Essentially contributors are assigning the same rights they have to
project's creator, no? What exactly feels wrong to you?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Sergey Didenko
wrote:
> Sorry if that was already answered,
>
> Is t
What about the real world
constraints ?
As far as I know, everyone needs
air, water, heat, and a minimal food
ration to survive.
The day I cut your air away, I bet
you'll be suddenly be very concerned
about the 'the physical world' and
that you will relinquish the
'digital age' way back in
Welcome to the "real world", where programmer ideals are often overridden
by the concerns of lawyers. That's what it comes down to, you have to do it
this way in the US (and other places) or risk legal issues.
https://www.clahub.com/pages/why_cla
Timothy
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Sergey
Sorry if that was already answered,
Is there a possibility to get rid of this legalwall?
I realize that there are good intents behind the existing practice, but it
feels a bit wrong for an open source artifact in the digital age of instant
sharing.
> Starting today, we have updated the Clojure
Thank you for all you do. This is wonderful!
-Michael O'Keefe
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 6:49:52 AM UTC-6, Tim Visher wrote:
>
> (boom)
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Alex Miller > wrote:
> > Starting today, we have updated the Clojure Contributor Agreement
> process.
> > The prior proce
(boom)
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Alex Miller wrote:
> Starting today, we have updated the Clojure Contributor Agreement process.
> The prior process which involved signing and mailing a form has been
> replaced with an online e-signing process.
>
> Existing contributors that have signed the
Very nice! \o/
2014-06-09 20:57 GMT+02:00 Plínio Balduino :
> \o/
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Michael Klishin
> wrote:
> > 2014-06-09 21:23 GMT+04:00 Alex Miller :
> >
> >> Starting today, we have updated the Clojure Contributor Agreement
> process.
> >> The prior process which involved
\o/
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Michael Klishin
wrote:
> 2014-06-09 21:23 GMT+04:00 Alex Miller :
>
>> Starting today, we have updated the Clojure Contributor Agreement process.
>> The prior process which involved signing and mailing a form has been
>> replaced with an online e-signing proces
2014-06-09 21:23 GMT+04:00 Alex Miller :
> Starting today, we have updated the Clojure Contributor Agreement process.
> The prior process which involved signing and mailing a form has been
> replaced with an online e-signing process.
\o/
--
MK
http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.co
Starting today, we have updated the Clojure Contributor Agreement process.
The prior process which involved signing and mailing a form has been
replaced with an online e-signing process.
Existing contributors that have signed the Contributor Agreement are
unaffected - those agreements are still in
12 matches
Mail list logo
