On Jul 2, 2:17 pm, Chouser wrote:
> Also, is there any reason not to call this contrib-1.0? It seems to me that
> it
> would be most useful to have major contrib versions simply map to major
> clojure
> versions: contrib-1.a.x for clojure-1.a.y
The consensus on the dev list seemed to be that
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Stuart
Sierra wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
> I have created a branch of clojure-contrib that should be fully
> compatible with Clojure 1.0:
> http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-contrib/tree/clojure-1.0-compatible
>
> This includes c.c.test-is with the older syntax for "a
Hi folks,
I have created a branch of clojure-contrib that should be fully
compatible with Clojure 1.0:
http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-contrib/tree/clojure-1.0-compatible
This includes c.c.test-is with the older syntax for "are". Maybe this
should be updated to use the newer syntax.
Contri
