On Sun, 2 May 2010 14:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Jarkko Oranen wrote:
> On May 2, 11:14 pm, Mike Meyer 620...@mired.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:06:56 +1000
> > To get behavior similar to the vector constructs, you want to use
> > list, which works like vector, except returning a list instead of
On May 2, 11:14 pm, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:06:56 +1000
> To get behavior similar to the vector constructs, you want to use
> list, which works like vector, except returning a list instead of a
> vector: (list 1 2 3 (print :hello)). It seems that what's missing here
> is a sy
On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:06:56 +1000
Alex Osborne wrote:
> e writes:
> > Can you imagine how disruptive it would be at this point to do it the
> > other way around? If you were starting out today without any Lisp
> > baggage, it seems TOTALLY obvious to me that lists would have been (1
> > 2 3), a
