Re: Guidelines/Recommendations for namespaces and qualified keywords

2016-10-18 Thread Alex Miller
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 10:17:15 PM UTC-5, Josh Tilles wrote: > > I’ve got a couple questions for Alex Miller and/or the other Cognitect > folks. > >1. *Are single-segment namespaces still “bad” when it comes to >registering specs under qualified keywords?* > > I will give

Re: Guidelines/Recommendations for namespaces and qualified keywords

2016-10-17 Thread Mauricio Aldazosa
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:46 PM, James Gatannah wrote: > > > On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 10:17:15 PM UTC-5, Josh Tilles wrote: >> >> I’ve got a couple questions for Alex Miller and/or the other Cognitect >> folks. >> > > That isn't me. I'm just chiming in from the peanut gallery. Must of my

Re: Guidelines/Recommendations for namespaces and qualified keywords

2016-10-17 Thread James Gatannah
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 10:17:15 PM UTC-5, Josh Tilles wrote: > > I’ve got a couple questions for Alex Miller and/or the other Cognitect > folks. > That isn't me. I'm just chiming in from the peanut gallery. Must of my "experience" so far stems from converting my toy projects from pri

Guidelines/Recommendations for namespaces and qualified keywords

2016-10-15 Thread Josh Tilles
I’ve got a couple questions for Alex Miller and/or the other Cognitect folks. 1. *Are single-segment namespaces still “bad” when it comes to registering specs under qualified keywords?* In the past, single-segment namespaces have been discouraged in the Clojure community—both becaus