To clarify, the key in the map/object would be munged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first po
The corollary of this would be that, in advanced mode, there is no way to
pass a property key to a function to access a js object property because
the key would be munged.
Right?
In which case - you need to be careful when attempting this sort of access.
For the case above, for now, I ported t
Nevermind, I think I can see why this is a non-starter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
firs
I will give a concrete example as explanation.
In pinot.events there is a function "on"
(on elems :click event_handler)
:click goes on to be looked up in the javascript map EventType in
goog.events
This lookup is done by string - which is fine in unoptimised code but does
not work in advanc
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Dave Sann wrote:
> I would like to have a macro to do the following, is this possible?
>
> (getm javascript-map "key")
>
> expands to:
>
> (.key javascript-map)
>
What advantage does the former have over the latter? The latter is shorter.
Also the new property sy
I would like to have a macro to do the following, is this possible?
(getm javascript-map "key")
expands to:
(.key javascript-map)
This is to manage situations where a javascript map/object is accessed by
string key.
In advanced optimisations mode this will fail.
The key must be accessed as a p
