Dear all,
After playing a bit with protocols I found this (which seems odd to me):
(All of this on clojure-1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT, downloaded with lein - i
don't know how recent it is)
user (defprotocol Foo (foo [x] )) ; We define a protocol Foo
user (def bar {:foo Foo}) ; We hide it in a
Hi,
On Jul 12, 10:44 am, Nicolas Oury nicolas.o...@gmail.com wrote:
After playing a bit with protocols I found this (which seems odd to me):
(All of this on clojure-1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT, downloaded with lein - i
don't know how recent it is)
user (defprotocol Foo (foo [x] )) ; We define
On 12 July 2010 10:44, Nicolas Oury nicolas.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it what it is supposed to do?
I think so.
The reason why this happens is that the Var backing the protocol holds
an immutable map, which extend modifies with alter-var-root; the copy
has the old version. You're able to add an
Ok. I understand.
So, if you want to do some programming that generates insances, it should be
done with symbols, at the macro-level?
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
On Jul 12, 10:44 am, Nicolas Oury nicolas.o...@gmail.com wrote:
After playing
