Just copy/paste from my Counterclockwise REPL. :-)
- Chas
On Mar 30, 2013, at 11:54 PM, JvJ wrote:
> Also, nice syntax highlighting! How'd you do that?
>
> On Saturday, 30 March 2013 23:54:03 UTC-4, JvJ wrote:
> get-method. Thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for!
>
> On Saturday, 30
Also, nice syntax highlighting! How'd you do that?
On Saturday, 30 March 2013 23:54:03 UTC-4, JvJ wrote:
>
> get-method. Thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for!
>
> On Saturday, 30 March 2013 07:20:54 UTC-4, Chas Emerick wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2013, at 12:00 AM, George Oliver wrote:
>>
get-method. Thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for!
On Saturday, 30 March 2013 07:20:54 UTC-4, Chas Emerick wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2013, at 12:00 AM, George Oliver wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 29, 2013 6:19:19 PM UTC-7, JvJ wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to invoke a particular multimethod
On Mar 30, 2013, at 12:00 AM, George Oliver wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, March 29, 2013 6:19:19 PM UTC-7, JvJ wrote:
> Is it possible to invoke a particular multimethod and bypass the dispatch
> function?
>
> For instance, suppose that I have a multimethod with a dispatch value of
> ::foo, and it'
On Friday, March 29, 2013 6:19:19 PM UTC-7, JvJ wrote:
>
> Is it possible to invoke a particular multimethod and bypass the dispatch
> function?
>
> For instance, suppose that I have a multimethod with a dispatch value of
> ::foo, and it's a really complex method.
>
> Now, I want all cases wher
Is it possible to invoke a particular multimethod and bypass the dispatch
function?
For instance, suppose that I have a multimethod with a dispatch value of
::foo, and it's a really complex method.
Now, I want all cases where the dispatch function returns nil to use the
same multimethod. Is t
