Re: Is oracle going to make the jvm part proprietary?

2009-05-30 Thread Vagif Verdi
Fear not. G1 is in Open-JDK, so no one can forbid you use it anyway you see fit. The clause in EULA is simply a lawyer talk, to cover their asses if someone uses experimental feature in production and looses his data or crashes server. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You rec

Re: Is oracle going to make the jvm part proprietary?

2009-05-30 Thread Tassilo Horn
Baishampayan Ghose writes: >> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/05/29/1711203/Java-Gets-New-Garbage-Collector-But-Only-If-You-Buy-Support?from=rss > > Who cares? There are many classy JVM implementations from third > parties like IBM. Well, at least them IBM one is proprietary. ,[ /usr/por

Re: Is oracle going to make the jvm part proprietary?

2009-05-30 Thread Baishampayan Ghose
> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/05/29/1711203/Java-Gets-New-Garbage-Collector-But-Only-If-You-Buy-Support?from=rss Who cares? There are many classy JVM implementations from third parties like IBM. BG -- Baishampayan Ghose oCricket.com http://oCricket.com --~--~-~--~~-

Is oracle going to make the jvm part proprietary?

2009-05-30 Thread aperotte
This slashdot story is kind of worrisome. http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/05/29/1711203/Java-Gets-New-Garbage-Collector-But-Only-If-You-Buy-Support?from=rss Do you all think this is the beginning of a trend? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message becaus