LabREPL status ... github returning 404's

2010-11-14 Thread Rick Moynihan
Hi all, When I ran some Clojure Dojo's in Dundee, we did a few group sessions going through labrepl and its exercises; and I thought the format worked well. I'm keen to do the same thing again, here in Manchester (UK): http://madlab.org.uk/content/kick-ass-coding-with-clojure/ Unfortunately the

Re: LabREPL status ... github returning 404's

2010-11-14 Thread Victor Olteanu
Github is down at the moment unfortunately... On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote: > Hi all, > > When I ran some Clojure Dojo's in Dundee, we did a few group sessions > going through labrepl and its exercises; and I thought the format > worked well. I'm keen to do the same thing

Re: LabREPL status ... github returning 404's

2010-11-15 Thread Rick Moynihan
On 14 November 2010 20:47, Victor Olteanu wrote: > Github is down at the moment unfortunately... Ahhh great, it's back up... Looks like github was partially down as other pages were returning for me. Thanks R. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cloj

Re: LabREPL status ... github returning 404's

2010-11-15 Thread Rick Moynihan
On 15 November 2010 09:46, Rick Moynihan wrote: > On 14 November 2010 20:47, Victor Olteanu wrote: >> Github is down at the moment unfortunately... > > Ahhh great, it's back up...  Looks like github was partially down as > other pages were returning for me. I'm guessing this was the cause... ht

Re: LabREPL status ... github returning 404's

2010-11-15 Thread Victor Olteanu
That's right - but I'm happy they are back up. I was in the middle of working for something requiring the clj-time library, and all of a sudden GitHub starts reporting it's missing. I was thinking, wow, did the author suddenly decided to take to the hills, like someone once did (in the Rails commu

Re: LabREPL status ... github returning 404's

2010-11-15 Thread Ken Wesson
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Victor Olteanu wrote: > That's right - but I'm happy they are back up. > I was in the middle of working for something requiring the clj-time library, > and all of a sudden GitHub starts reporting it's missing. I was thinking, > wow, did the author suddenly decided