On Sep 11, 11:33 am, Stephen C. Gilardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 11, 2008, at 8:12 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
Using the latest syntax is good, although the idiom for static calls
is (Classname/method args). For instance:
(clojure.lang.Namespace/find sym)
instead of:
(.find
On Sep 10, 10:59 pm, Stephen C. Gilardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 10, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
It would work, but it seems like overkill. In particular, there's no
intention to extend it any further, and all symbol versions do the
same thing, call find-ns and delegate,
On Sep 11, 2008, at 8:12 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:Using the latest syntax is good, although the idiom for static callsis (Classname/method args). For instance:(clojure.lang.Namespace/find sym)instead of:(.find clojure.lang.Namespace sym)because static methods really aren't functions taking classes,
On Sep 9, 8:17 pm, Stephen C. Gilardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rich mentioned a desire for the ns-* functions to accept either a
symbol or a namespace for arguments where they currently accept a
namespace.
Using a multimethod that dispatches on the class of that argument is
one way to do
On Sep 10, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:It would work, but it seems like overkill. In particular, there's nointention to extend it any further, and all symbol versions do thesame thing, call find-ns and delegate, so maybe just adding a letlevel to the existing fns is best:(let [ns (the-ns
Rich mentioned a desire for the ns-* functions to accept either a
symbol or a namespace for arguments where they currently accept a
namespace.
Using a multimethod that dispatches on the class of that argument is
one way to do that.
Here's an example:
(defmulti ns-aliases class)
