Alex Miller writes:
> On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 1:55:42 AM UTC-5, henrik42 wrote:
>>> Oh, I thought because there is the float-function floats are supported.
>> Clojure could use "0.2f" to print/read floats and still use double "0.2" as
>> the default (but float's "Infinity" may be challengin
On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 1:55:42 AM UTC-5, henrik42 wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> Am Samstag, 24. Juni 2017 13:38:55 UTC schrieb Alex Miller:
>>
>>
>>
>> Oh, I thought because there is the float-function floats are supported.
> Clojure could use "0.2f" to print/read floats and still use double "0.2" a
Alex,
Am Samstag, 24. Juni 2017 13:38:55 UTC schrieb Alex Miller:
>
>
> Due to how single and double precision floats are stored, you'll get these
> same results in Java too. These will store differently imprecise
> representations of the number (remember base 2, not 10).
>
> user=> (Integer/toB
On Saturday, June 24, 2017 at 3:36:21 AM UTC-5, henrik42 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing a little write-up on Java basics and comparing some of them
> to Clojure (things like mutable shared state, side effects and so
> on). When I came to "numbers" I was surprised by some of the things I
> found in
Hi,
I'm doing a little write-up on Java basics and comparing some of them
to Clojure (things like mutable shared state, side effects and so
on). When I came to "numbers" I was surprised by some of the things I
found in Clojure.
(== (double 0.5) (float 0.5)) ;; -> true
(== (double 0.2) (fl
