On Thursday 18 September 2008 15:28, falcon wrote:
Looks like the FrTime dissertation was published this year:
Integrating Dataflow Evaluation into a Practical Higher-Order
Call-by- Value Language
By Gregory Cooper
http://dl.lib.brown.edu/pdfs/etd67.20080429180432.pdf
This document
On Sep 18, 5:17 pm, falcon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google often brings me to the cells website, but I haven't been able
to figure out what it exactly is, you are right about the
documentation.
I've met Ken Tilton (Cells' author) at LispNYC, so here's what I've
gathered -- you define a Model
How do long-running systems like
Erlang handle this problem?
iiuc, erlang doesn't have transactions so it is a different situation.
when you redefine a function, the next time the (standard approach to
writing erlang actors) tail call goes back into the function it will
be actually going into
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Stuart Sierra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On a related note, would it be possible to implement atomic, system-
wide transactions by suspending the current computation, replacing
some root bindings, and continuing? How do long-running systems like
Erlang handle
Google often brings me to the cells website, but I haven't been able
to figure out what it exactly is, you are right about the
documentation.
Although, speaking of documentation, I wish clojure also had some
printable documents, tutorial which I could pack in my bag and read on
the train. The
Looks like the FrTime dissertation was published this year:
Integrating Dataflow Evaluation into a Practical Higher-Order Call-by-
Value Language
By Gregory Cooper
http://dl.lib.brown.edu/pdfs/etd67.20080429180432.pdf
A quote from it:
A technique similar to that employed by FrTime has been
Brief response to:
On Sep 16, 11:40 pm, falcon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also notice that Clojure has the ability
to change programs while they are running; however, I haven't been
able to find examples of this.
Most Lisps give you this for free, since the compiler is integrated
into the
On Sep 16, 11:40 pm, falcon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work on financial software--the kind that reads streaming data and
static data from various sources, transforms these streams through
various calculations and possibly decides to send out trades.
...
Is there a good solution to the
On Sep 17, 12:45 pm, Rich Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While it is possible to make a globally visible change to a var with
def, the only appropriate scenarios for doing so are to fix a bug, or
for scratch vars at the repl.
This brings up an idea I had a while back -- what if you wanted
It's an interesting idea, and something I tried, but the overhead was
too great.
i know less than nothing here, of course, but... any way to make the
default case of nothing has changed be somehow fast (enough), and
only the oh poop things got edited have to go into slow-mo for a
second to
10 matches
Mail list logo