On Nov 28, 1:20 pm, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
One benefit of having a REPL: it makes regular expressions usable. So easy
to test and tweak your RE compared to the traditional compile/test/debug
cycle! I never even bothered with the java.util.regex package before Clojure
One benefit of having a REPL: it makes regular expressions usable. So easy
to test and tweak your RE compared to the traditional compile/test/debug
cycle! I never even bothered with the java.util.regex package before Clojure
as it was too painful to use.
--
You received this message because you
Hi,
On Nov 28, 2:20 pm, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
One benefit of having a REPL: it makes regular expressions usable. So easy
to test and tweak your RE compared to the traditional compile/test/debug
cycle! I never even bothered with the java.util.regex package before Clojure
Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 28, 2:20�pm, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
One benefit of having a REPL: it makes regular expressions usable. So easy
to test and tweak your RE compared to the traditional compile/test/debug
cycle! I never even bothered
Hi,
On 28 Nov., 17:32, Nathan Hawkins uts...@gmail.com wrote:
Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
I wonder how hard it would be in Clojure to implement something like
Edi Weitz' RegexpCoach
http://weitz.de/regex-coach/. I know Perl programmer who regularly
create their (un)regular expressions with
On 28 Nov., 14:20, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
One benefit of having a REPL: it makes regular expressions usable. So easy
to test and tweak your RE compared to the traditional compile/test/debug
cycle! I never even bothered with the java.util.regex package before Clojure
