On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Marc Dzaebel wrote:
> However, if you need the multiple features of records, you would need to
> have the generated code of defrecord in order to reimplement records with
> deftype. Is there something available?
Hey Marc,
I've recently been using this little li
>> use deftype which is more low-level and I think doesn't define equals or
put y in meta data that don't participate in equality...:)
Hi Jim,
this works! However, if you need the multiple features of records, you
would need to have the generated code of defrecord in order to reimplement
recor
use deftype which is more low-level and I think doesn't define equals or
put y in meta data that don't participate in equality...:)
Jim
On 22/10/13 22:44, Marc Dzaebel wrote:
http://cmayes.wikispaces.com/PracticalClojure13: ...
defrecord does not support Java class inheritance, so it can
http://cmayes.wikispaces.com/PracticalClojure13: ...
> defrecord does not support Java class inheritance, so it cannot override
> methods of Java classes, even abstract classes. However, it does permit you
> to override methods of java.lang.Object such as hashCode, equals, and
> toString. Simpl
(defrecord R [x y]) automatically defines a reasonable *equals* method
using x & y. However, is it possible to overwrite the method as it should
use X only? My tries resulted in *"Duplicate method name&signature in class
...". Do I have to use extend-type?*
--
--
You received this message bec
