Re: Parallel version of list comprehension

2010-02-08 Thread Tim Snyder
Sure, I was going to add it last night, but brain had shut down for the night. The program I'm working on is a Communicating Sequential Processes toolbox, so you can write a process and collect the traces (along with other tools that simplify expressions and such). I've written a traces function

Re: Parallel version of list comprehension

2010-02-08 Thread Sean Devlin
Do you have a specific example, some code you could paste? On Feb 7, 11:53 pm, Tim Snyder wrote: > Is there a straight-forward way to get parallelization when using list > comprehension? > The form of "for" syntax is much preferable to the closest I could > come up with using pmap.  I also was ha

Parallel version of list comprehension

2010-02-07 Thread Tim Snyder
Is there a straight-forward way to get parallelization when using list comprehension? The form of "for" syntax is much preferable to the closest I could come up with using pmap. I also was having trouble getting the correct level of nesting down when using pmap, though probably because I'm tired.