Re: Parser irritation

2010-03-19 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, On Mar 19, 9:49 am, alux wrote: > (btw the "exported" in you second line certainly should be "imported") Woops. Yes. You are right. Should be "imported". Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group,

Re: Parser irritation

2010-03-19 Thread alux
Ah. Interesting. (btw the "exported" in you second line certainly should be "imported") So it interprets huhu. as full qualified class name and leaves it alone. Thank you for the explanation. Regards, alux On 19 Mrz., 09:38, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: > Hi, > > On Mar 19, 9:16 am, alux wrote:

Re: Parser irritation

2010-03-19 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, On Mar 19, 9:16 am, alux wrote: > is this a bug or a feature? (And how could I know.) > > spels=> (macroexpand `(huhu huhu.)) > (spels/huhu huhu.) > > If the symbol ends with a dot, it doesnt get resolved with name space. > I suspect thats because it will get special interpretation as Java >

Parser irritation

2010-03-19 Thread alux
Hello, is this a bug or a feature? (And how could I know.) spels=> (macroexpand `(huhu huhu.)) (spels/huhu huhu.) If the symbol ends with a dot, it doesnt get resolved with name space. I suspect thats because it will get special interpretation as Java constructor. But what kind of magic is at wo