On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Konrad Hinsen
wrote:
> It's a bug. More specifically, a typo in a recent improvement. It is fixed
> now, so please try again with the current version - or in fact go back to an
> older version before December 28.
Thanks! I pulled the latest clojure-contrib source,
On 08.01.2010, at 06:21, joel r wrote:
But right now I need some help. Either I'm using dist-m wrong, or it's
a bug I've found.
It's a bug. More specifically, a typo in a recent improvement. It is
fixed now, so please try again with the current version - or in fact
go back to an older vers
Hi,
I'm new to monads in clojure, and I'm loving them, they're really awesome!
But right now I need some help. Either I'm using dist-m wrong, or it's
a bug I've found.
It can be reproduced with:
clojure commit f4c58e3500b3668a0941ca21f9aa4f444de2c652
clojure-contrib commit 25fec5b5771408c30b802b
I figured you'd had a good reason for doing it the way you did.
Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On 24.12.2009, at 05:18, jim wrote:
>
> > I was looking at the probability monad today and think this definition
> > of m-bind might be easier to understand.
> >
> > (defmonad
On 24.12.2009, at 05:18, jim wrote:
> I was looking at the probability monad today and think this definition
> of m-bind might be easier to understand.
>
> (defmonad dist-m
> [m-result (fn m-result-dist [v]
> {v 1})
> m-bind (fn m-bind-dist [mv f]
>
Hey Konrad,
I was looking at the probability monad today and think this definition
of m-bind might be easier to understand.
(defmonad dist-m
[m-result (fn m-result-dist [v]
{v 1})
m-bind (fn m-bind-dist [mv f]
(reduce (partial merge-with
