I think it would aid compatibility between edn implementations if we had an
agreed upon formal syntax. To that end, I've tried my hand at specifying
one. I've posted it as issue 56 on edn-format/edn:
https://github.com/edn-format/edn/issues/56
I'll incorporate fixes for any problems that are
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:46 PM, kovas boguta kovas.bog...@gmail.comwrote:
I agree that would be a Good Thing. This looks like an excellent start.
Is this specification executable in Instaparse?
IMO specs that are immediately computable are more useful and more likely
to be correct.
No,
I agree that would be a Good Thing. This looks like an excellent start.
Is this specification executable in Instaparse?
IMO specs that are immediately computable are more useful and more likely
to be correct.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Ben Smith-Mannschott
bsmith.o...@gmail.com
