After a few thoughts, I think this is a mistake not to allow this,
even if it his highly discouraged.
I think indeed, if you consider the data-structure usage of types and
Objects it is a very bad idea to have a mutable private field.
But some type you create are not for holding data on the
Dear all,
Is there a way to make some mutable fields public in a deftype?
Best regards,
Nicolas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members
Hi,
Am 23.12.2010 um 15:26 schrieb nicolas.o...@gmail.com:
Is there a way to make some mutable fields public in a deftype?
I think it is opinionated, that this is not possible as the documentation
states explicitly that the fields will be private when made mutable. You could
write a special
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 23.12.2010 um 15:26 schrieb nicolas.o...@gmail.com:
Is there a way to make some mutable fields public in a deftype?
I think it is opinionated, that this is not possible as the documentation
states explicitly
Hi,
Am 23.12.2010 um 23:15 schrieb nicolas.o...@gmail.com:
If I were to write such a patch, would it be accepted?
I lean now quite a bit out the window, but I dare say: „No.“ The reason I think
so is that this is opinionated.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 23.12.2010 um 23:15 schrieb nicolas.o...@gmail.com:
If I were to write such a patch, would it be accepted?
I lean now quite a bit out the window, but I dare say: „No.“ The reason I
think so is that this is
I think that's an even more opinionated no. :)
On Dec 23, 4:54 pm, nicolas.o...@gmail.com nicolas.o...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 23.12.2010 um 23:15 schrieb nicolas.o...@gmail.com:
If I were to write such a patch,
