My two cents:
Adding spec inside the original namespace is more readable, provide
documentation just in place, and the user do not need to require a separate
namespace to get spec of your API, I will prefer it.
For users stay in < clojure 1.9.0, I use this macro in my code:
(defmacro opt-requi
Those are the two obvious options and both are fine. The latter makes
loading and use of the spec optional. If you do that, we recommend putting
specs in the.namespace.specs for the.namespace.
On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 12:00:30 PM UTC-5, Howard M. Lewis Ship
wrote:
>
> I'm thinking of r
If you’re planning to target versions of Clojure prior to 1.9, you’ll want the
specs in a separate file – as does clojure.java.jdbc (supports Clojure 1.7+).
If you’re only planning to target 1.9+, I’d probably lean toward putting the
spec in the same namespace at this point. Adoption of new Cloj
