Hi Mike,
On 10 March 2010 21:03, Mike Erickson wrote:
> I am writing a simple blackjack game in Clojure
I've written up a little commentary as to how I'd approach this
problem differently:
http://gist.github.com/328929
which hopefully will give you some ideas. The general thrust being to
keep yo
On 11 March 2010 17:15, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> You probably want to use conj instead of concat!
Actually ignore that! I was being confused by the deck-building.
Can you try running this code:
http://gist.github.com/328912
It is exactly the same as yours but uses known starting conditions...
and
On 11 March 2010 17:10, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> I tried running your code and it worked fine for me...
Ah excuse me it only 'worked' because I used vectors instead of lists:
> [5 \S]]] [:player []]), :house ([:house []]), :deck nil}
<--- should give you the clue you need,
You probably want to
On 10 March 2010 21:03, Mike Erickson wrote:
> but calling (deal 2 :house) bombs out with the following stacktrace:
Hi Mike,
I tried running your code and it worked fine for me... so I think
something else is playing tricks on you here like maybe you changed
the function in your text buffer but
I am seeing a difference in running the contents of a function vs.
running the function by name in a REPL. I am writing a simple
blackjack game in Clojure, and have a ref called 'cards' for
representing the state of the game. I initialize it this way:
user> (dosync (alter cards assoc
:deck (bu
