On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> Scopes will not make dynamic bindings linger in lazy seqs. Agreed that is a
> terrible idea.
In other words scopes would have only half-solved the problem anyway? Ack.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
>> 2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Laurent PETIT
>>> wrote:
2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stuart Halloway
> wrote:
>> One goal of resource scopes [1] is to help
2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Laurent PETIT
> wrote:
> > 2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Laurent PETIT
> >> wrote:
> >> > 2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stuart Halloway
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > One go
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> 2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Laurent PETIT
>> wrote:
>> > 2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stuart Halloway
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > One goal of resource scopes [1] is to help with sc
2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Laurent PETIT
> wrote:
> > 2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stuart Halloway
> >> wrote:
> >> > One goal of resource scopes [1] is to help with scoping activities at
> >> > the REPL. That said, I think this is a
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> 2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stuart Halloway
>> wrote:
>> > One goal of resource scopes [1] is to help with scoping activities at
>> > the REPL. That said, I think this is a "ramping up" problem -- I rarely if
>
On Jan 8, 12:25 pm, Brian Goslinga wrote:
> I find that if your code is functional, laziness works quite well
> (except for the rare expensive function + chunking problem).
>
> Perhaps your code isn't very functional? (your mention of binding
> suggests that)
That's a valid observation, most of t
Didn't knew about scope, it looks like an interesting feature. Still
as you point this is pretty much a problem BKAC!
On Jan 8, 12:33 pm, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> One goal of resource scopes [1] is to help with scoping activities at the
> REPL. That said, I think this is a "ramping up" problem -
2011/1/8 Ken Wesson
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stuart Halloway
> wrote:
> > One goal of resource scopes [1] is to help with scoping activities at the
> REPL. That said, I think this is a "ramping up" problem -- I rarely if ever
> hit it anymore.
> >
> > Stu
> >
> > [1] http://dev.clojure
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> One goal of resource scopes [1] is to help with scoping activities at the
> REPL. That said, I think this is a "ramping up" problem -- I rarely if ever
> hit it anymore.
>
> Stu
>
> [1] http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Resource+Scope
One goal of resource scopes [1] is to help with scoping activities at the REPL.
That said, I think this is a "ramping up" problem -- I rarely if ever hit it
anymore.
Stu
[1] http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Resource+Scopes
> I've been doing a lot of Clojure lately and, of all thing,
> col
On Jan 7, 7:03 pm, Nicolas Buduroi wrote:
> I've been doing a lot of Clojure lately and, of all thing,
> collection's laziness coupled with a REPL is what makes me loose the
> most time. I really love having laziness built-in by default and I'm a
> REPL-driven development addict, but sometimes I j
I do this too on occasion, and my opinion is: better to chase them in
the REPL than in deployed code, because the same problem would usually
come up there.
On Jan 7, 5:03 pm, Nicolas Buduroi wrote:
> I've been doing a lot of Clojure lately and, of all thing,
> collection's laziness coupled with a
I've been doing a lot of Clojure lately and, of all thing,
collection's laziness coupled with a REPL is what makes me loose the
most time. I really love having laziness built-in by default and I'm a
REPL-driven development addict, but sometimes I just loose minutes (if
not hours) chasing imaginary
14 matches
Mail list logo