Clojury and conj.us are good names, I think.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:47 AM, cwyang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What a great name 'conj' is, for project hosting site name!
(no shame for self-complement :-) )
user= (def repository '(proj-foo proj-bar))
#=(var user/repository)
user= (conj
Ruby has gems, python has eggs, I guess Clojure could have jewels.
And Clojure could have Clojury of jewels.
So +1 for clojury.
On 11/17/08, Drew Crampsie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey All,
I've finally found some time to start getting the project hosting site
together, and i need a
At the risk of sounding like an old fart, I cringe when I hear Clojury and
Jewel - they are too cute (as Rich nicely put it a while back -
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/0351ca20c758b0b3).
I agree with Brian Carper - we should keep it readable so +1 for something
like clojureforge -
I'm not in favour of slangish derivatives. They're good for code-
names, but when you get serious, a silly name is an obstacle.
First of all, pronunciation descriptors after the name are down-right
silly. People start making remarks that you sound like a Wikipedia
article.
Moreover, it's hard
+1
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:54:22 -0800 (PST)
David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not in favour of slangish derivatives. They're good for code-
names, but when you get serious, a silly name is an obstacle.
First of all, pronunciation descriptors after the name are down-right
silly. People
+1
On Nov 18, 2008, at 8:27 AM, blackdog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:54:22 -0800 (PST)
David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not in favour of slangish derivatives. They're good for code-
names, but when you get serious, a silly name is an obstacle.
First of all,
2008/11/18 David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- % ---
That being said, why can't clojure.org be used for that purpose? If I
remember correctly, all it takes is some DNS magic, and we have a,
say, project.clojure.org. Hosted on another physical machine, if need
be.
That gets my vote!
+1
--
Geoff
I like forj, but after reflecting on that it might be better to simply
use clojure.org.
-m
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Drew Crampsie [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hey All,
I've finally found some time to start getting the project hosting site
together, and i need a name.. so lets put it to a vote.
Here are some suggestions so far, but please feel free to chime in
with your own
I'm liking projecture
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Drew Crampsie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey All,
I've finally found some time to start getting the project hosting site
together, and i need a name.. so lets put it to a vote.
Here are some suggestions so far, but please feel free to
my vote is for projecture or clojects
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
Other options:
- creatjure?
- featjure?
- cultjure?
All three have low Google search hit counts. I think cultjure is
better suited for discussion forums. Creatjure seems a good place for
our Clojure creatures.
On Nov 17, 2:52 pm, Drew Crampsie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey All,
I've
+1 for projecture
Vincent
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 17, 11:52 am, Drew Crampsie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are some suggestions so far, but please feel free to chime in
with your own as well.
What about something made of whole words, like clojureforge? It has
the benefit of discoverability and being pronounceable by the human
tongue.
2008/11/17 Matt Revelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is the project site going to be more similar to the Python package
index and CLiki or Sourceforge?
The closest analog is common-lisp.net.. which is like sourceforge.
However, I like the idea of an index as well, and building the backend
seems like a
I'm in favor of something with clojure in it (like clojureforge).
Something simple to spell and pronounce. I'm also in favor of not
forcing code hosting, but providing it as an option.
Paul
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Drew Crampsie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/17 Matt Revelle
+1 for projecture
=
ANGOL
=
-|[EMAIL PROTECTED], =|+^_^X++~_~,@-
The only thing worse than a hopeless romantic is a hopeful one
Magbasa bago Mamuna. Mag-isip bago mambatikos
Without Truth there is no Justice,
Without Justice, there is Tyranny
Semper fi
Proof of Desire is
How about 'conj'?
conj is (1) for 'conj' in Clojure, and (2) for abbrev of 'conjure',
meaning (Conjuring Clojure).
'cons' for lisp, and 'conj' for clojure. :-)
--
Chul-Woong Yang
On Nov 18, 4:52 am, Drew Crampsie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey All,
I've finally found some time to start
What a great name 'conj' is, for project hosting site name!
(no shame for self-complement :-) )
user= (def repository '(proj-foo proj-bar))
#=(var user/repository)
user= (conj repository 'proj-yours)
(proj-yours proj-foo proj-bar)
However, conj.net is already occupied. ;-(
conj.us is avaliable,
19 matches
Mail list logo
