When I was trying to interoperate with Java libraries, I really missed
annotations. Not that Lisp really needs annotations. But to
interoperate with Java, you do sometimes.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send em
Search the mailing list for swear words. That should be a start :)
On Dec 28, 7:04 pm, Jules wrote:
> > the issues faced by Clojure users.
>
> Is there a list somewhere?
>
> Jules
>
> On Dec 28, 8:07 pm, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, ashishwave wrote:
> > > Req
> the issues faced by Clojure users.
Is there a list somewhere?
Jules
On Dec 28, 8:07 pm, Rich Hickey wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, ashishwave wrote:
> > Request for prioritizing the 2010 roadmap. New year is just few days
> > ahead :-)
>
> I don't like to publish roadmaps, as oft
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, ashishwave wrote:
> Request for prioritizing the 2010 roadmap. New year is just few days
> ahead :-)
>
I don't like to publish roadmaps, as often the best features in any
particular year wouldn't have been on the roadmap for that year.
> What should be the new
Well 1.1 is just around the corner. And 1.2 will probably bring all the
deftype/defprotocol goodness. I imagine that Clojure-in-Clojure will be one
of the big projects for 2010.
You should check out http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/ for more info.
David
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, as
Request for prioritizing the 2010 roadmap. New year is just few days
ahead :-)
What should be the new features which we would like to see in clojure
May be some faatures from other dialects of LISP or some other jvm
based language feature or something innovative idea.
Let us list/share those
