On Wednesday, 27 March 2013 08:06:30 UTC+5:30, Leif wrote:
Hi, Shantanu.
Thanks for the suggestions. A couple thoughts:
1. Many times, I seem to stub or mock things that are scattered here and
there in the code, like things that send email or log metrics, etc. so
they are not really
Sorry, in the last illustration, the (binding [*deps* deps] ...) cannot be
useful for Compojure route handlers because dynamic vars are bound at a
thread-local level; you will probably have to `alter-var-root` it to some
var and have the handlers use that static var instead. In the code I write
On Mar 27, 2013 1:56 AM, Shantanu Kumar kumar.shant...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, in the last illustration, the (binding [*deps* deps] ...) cannot
be useful for Compojure route handlers because dynamic vars are bound at a
thread-local level; you will probably have to `alter-var-root` it to some
var
On Wednesday, 27 March 2013 17:54:01 UTC+5:30, John Hume wrote:
On Mar 27, 2013 1:56 AM, Shantanu Kumar kumar.s...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Sorry, in the last illustration, the (binding [*deps* deps] ...) cannot
be useful for Compojure route handlers because dynamic vars are bound
Hi, Allen.
My own version of with-redefs? That *sounds* kind of hard. Could you keep
an atom with the original bound value (the first one my-with-redefs sees,
anyway) and then always roll back to that value? Something like that?
Thanks,
Leif
On Monday, March 25, 2013 1:58:53 AM UTC-4,
Hi, Shantanu.
Thanks for the suggestions. A couple thoughts:
1. Many times, I seem to stub or mock things that are scattered here and
there in the code, like things that send email or log metrics, etc. so
they are not really isolated (or isolatable??), but I still want to test
that they get
On Monday, 25 March 2013 06:45:32 UTC+5:30, Leif wrote:
Hello, fellow Clojurians.
One problem I've run into when stubbing fns is that with-redefs doesn't
play well with concurrency. E.g.
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/with-redefs#example_994
The problem arises
Hello, fellow Clojurians.
One problem I've run into when stubbing fns is that with-redefs doesn't
play well with concurrency. E.g.
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/with-redefs#example_994
The problem arises because, quoting with-redef's docstring, These
temporary changes
I've also run into the problem. You could write your own version of
with-redefs (it's not that hard). In your case, it sounds like you're not
running tests in parallel in the same process, so could you work around it
by waiting for your app to finish initializing before running tests?
Allen
