On 2013-07-08, at 2:40 AM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> thank you all for your answer.
>
> So to go back to my original concern, there does not seem to be a way
> to do this as I intended by just combining the existing features in
> core.
>
I'm not sure what you're asking for here. Do you mean *in-
thank you all for your answer.
So to go back to my original concern, there does not seem to be a way
to do this as I intended by just combining the existing features in
core.
Cheers,
--
Laurent
2013/7/8 Yoshinori Kohyama :
> Hi Laurent,
>
> How about a macro like below?
>
> (defmacro tt
>
Hi Laurent,
How about a macro like below?
(defmacro tt
([x] x)
([x ts tr & more] `(tt (if (~ts ~x) (~tr ~x) ~x) ~@more)))
To use this,
(tt x test1 transform1 test2 transform2 test3 transform3)
This doesn't work even number of arguments as you see.
HTH,
Y.Kohyama
--
--
You recei
On Friday, 5 July 2013 16:52:10 UTC+1, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> 2013/7/5 Mikera >:
> > I really like the as-> macro for this kind of thing.
> >
> > (as-> (something) x
> > (if (test1 x) (transform1 x) x)
> > (if (test2 x) (transform2 x) x)
> > (do-something-else-with
2013/7/5 Mikera :
> I really like the as-> macro for this kind of thing.
>
> (as-> (something) x
> (if (test1 x) (transform1 x) x)
> (if (test2 x) (transform2 x) x)
> (do-something-else-with x y)
> (if (test3 x) (transform3 x) x))
>
> Advantages:
> - It's part of
I really like the as-> macro for this kind of thing.
(as-> (something) x
(if (test1 x) (transform1 x) x)
(if (test2 x) (transform2 x) x)
(do-something-else-with x y)
(if (test3 x) (transform3 x) x))
Advantages:
- It's part of core in 1.5
- It's a macro and com
Hi,
you could use a macro, but a simple function should suffice. I use
something along the lines of
(defn cond-transform [x & pairs]
(reduce (fn [x [test-fn transform-fn]]
(if (test-fn x)
(transform-fn x)
x))
x
pairs))
;; example
hello,
More often than not, I'm facing code looking like this:
(let [x (if (test1 x) (transform1 x) x)
x (if (test2 x) (transform2 x) x)
x (if (test3 x) (transform3 x) x)]
x)
Do you know of a better way to write this with only clojure.core functions?
So far, I've had no success
