I'm having similar problems, but am hesitant to post until I do some
further analysis.
However, I thought I'd share some techniques I'm trying to use to hunt
down my memory leak.
First, you can make GC verbose.
-verbose:gc
For even more detail, add the following.
-XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps
Hi,
not sure if it works here, but what about adapting advice from Stuart
Halloway's Programming Clojure (pages 159-160, 'Losing your head') and
use a function returning a sequence instead of a 'bound by let' name
(the actual advice in the book is to use functions returning sequences
instead of
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Miron Brezuleanu wrote:
not sure if it works here, but what about adapting advice from Stuart
Halloway's Programming Clojure (pages 159-160, 'Losing your head') and
use a function returning a sequence instead of a 'bound by let' name
(the actual advice in
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:00:34PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
For now, I'll do without the with-open, since in this particular case,
errors are going to be fairly fatal anyway.
BTW, I still haven't been able to figure out how to write this
function without hanging onto the collection across the
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 05:05:17PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:00:34PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
For now, I'll do without the with-open, since in this particular case,
errors are going to be fairly fatal anyway.
BTW, I still haven't been able to figure out how to write
