I am familiar with Mono, but not with the Mono developer attempts to
make it a happy place for FP. Thanks for the tip.
The more the merrier.
On Jun 11, 2:27 pm, John \Z-Bo\ Zabroski johnzabro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 11, 12:11 am, David Miller dmiller2...@gmail.com wrote:
Improving the
On Jun 11, 12:11 am, David Miller dmiller2...@gmail.com wrote:
Improving the performance of ClojureCLR is in the top two development
goals. (Porting to Mono is the other.)
Are you familiar with Mono and the recent attempts from the Mono
developers to make the VM more functional programming
I am basically in love with Clojure. It fixes everything I ever found
annoying about Lisp dialects, except for type safety (which I can live
without for many scenarios).
But I feel like my love is unrequited: Clojure is a JVM language, and
all my core libraries at .NET.
The rest of this post
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:31 PM, John Z-Bo Zabroski johnzabro...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am basically in love with Clojure. It fixes everything I ever found
annoying about Lisp dialects, except for type safety (which I can live
without for many scenarios).
But I feel like my love is unrequited:
Actually, ClojureCLR is also DLR-based, relying on Expression Trees
V2, but not the hosting goodies. Thus, it might be runnable directly
in .NET 4.0 without the DLR.
For ClojureCLR: Performance of the core libraries is quite good.
Startup time is quite good. Of compiled Clojure code, not so
