Re: Strictly tagged clojure

2015-08-08 Thread Alan Malloy
cept the requisite >>> responsibility for managing their types. >>> >>> While the odds that these changes will be accepted as-is are slim, we >>> think they represent a valuable addition to the language and so >>> present them for your consideration. >>

Re: Strictly tagged clojure

2015-08-08 Thread Shantanu Kumar
accepted as-is are slim, we >> think they represent a valuable addition to the language and so >> present them for your consideration. >> >> - Reid >> >> [1] - http://blog.factual.com/strictly-tagged-clojure >> [2] - https://github.com/alexander-yakushev/cloj

Re: Strictly tagged clojure

2015-08-06 Thread Alex Miller
the language and so > present them for your consideration. > > - Reid > > [1] - http://blog.factual.com/strictly-tagged-clojure > [2] - https://github.com/alexander-yakushev/clojure/pull/1 > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

Strictly tagged clojure

2015-08-06 Thread Reid McKenzie
m, we think they represent a valuable addition to the language and so present them for your consideration. - Reid [1] - http://blog.factual.com/strictly-tagged-clojure [2] - https://github.com/alexander-yakushev/clojure/pull/1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G