On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Stuart Sierra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So there's a decision to be made: should Clojure behave more like a
> scripting language (invoke by file) or more like Java (invoke by
> class)? There are pros and cons either way. Theoretically, it could
> support bo
On Nov 21, 3:56 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a patch that works like Stuart's file compiler, but it
> takes lib names as arguments and compiles them.
Shucks, looks like all that was missing (from my 2nd try) was
Symbol.intern! Oh well. This looks good to
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
> I'm in favor. I'd like to get a single story together incorporating
> Stuart's build.xml, his file compiler:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/4f0aa3be9a2dc79d
>
> and this path suggestion.
I've uploaded a patch that works like St
On Nov 20, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> Yes! All we need is a file compiler that works. :) There's something
> missing, in both my attempts, which causes the root class file for the
> namespace not to be generated. Rich, any idea what's missing?
It looks to me like compiling libs
On Nov 20, 2:04 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in favor. I'd like to get a single story together incorporating
> Stuart's build.xml, his file compiler:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/4f0aa3be9a2dc79d
>
> and this path suggestion.
Yes! All we need is a file compi
On Nov 20, 11:28 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently the compiler writes classes to the hierarchy under the value
> of *compile-path* whose root binding is "classes".
>
> As we see in Stuart's build.xml patch, it can convenient to be able to
> specify such a path as p
Currently the compiler writes classes to the hierarchy under the value
of *compile-path* whose root binding is "classes".
As we see in Stuart's build.xml patch, it can convenient to be able to
specify such a path as part of the JVM's environment.
To support that, I suggest the following:
