Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-21 Thread Linus Ericsson
Would it be possible to store the original defn s-expression source code in metadata added to the java byte-code function? It would be highly inefficient (and most of the time meaningless) for autogenerated functions, but quite a small overhead for the few locs a developer spits out during a hack-

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-21 Thread Colin Yates
Have you considered opening it to remote users? I wouldn't be able to contribute anything, but I would love to watch... On 21 September 2011 14:07, Brian Marick wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Christopher Redinger wrote: > > Thursday evening we'll have the time, space and power to do th

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-21 Thread Brian Marick
On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Christopher Redinger wrote: > Thursday evening we'll have the time, space and power to do this post-supper. > A round table may be hard to come by, but I'll see what we can do. > > Keep me in the loop on what else you'll need. Thanks Chris. Not enough people (2) sai

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-09 Thread Christopher Redinger
On Thursday, September 8, 2011 5:36:17 PM UTC-4, Brian Marick wrote: > > I'd be willing to do the implementation work to allow us to run this > experiment at the Conj during after-hours or other hacking time. I'd need to > know there were interested participants and someone from the Conj > organ

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-09 Thread Phil Hagelberg
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer (kotarak) wrote: > As for the code problem: modify the send-and-eval functions of your > environments to also include the source code in a meta tag. So the dev env > would basically send and eval: (defn ^{:source "(defn foo ...)"} foo [] ..) > Ins

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-09 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer (kotarak)
Hi, Vim uses an embedded nailgun server. As for the code problem: modify the send-and-eval functions of your environments to also include the source code in a meta tag. So the dev env would basically send and eval: (defn ^{:source "(defn foo ...)"} foo [] ..) Instead of just the defn form itse

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-09 Thread Sam Aaron
On 8 Sep 2011, at 23:54, Phil Hagelberg wrote: > >> As he presented, I found myself thinking that a similar thing should be >> possible with 8 Emacs instances talking to one `lein swank` instance. > > Nah, you should do it with a single Emacs instance with 8 emacsclients > connected; that way

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-09 Thread Sam Aaron
Hi Brian, This is something I'd be TOTALLY up for. Also, your setup description sounds very similar to the setup Jeff Rose and I use to jam and hack Overtone together. In fact, we went one step further and allowed both Emacs and Vim instances to communicate with the same shared JVM. All we nee

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-08 Thread daly
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 23:36 +0200, Brian Marick wrote: > TL;DR: I have an idea for an after-hours coding experiment at the Conj. > Interested? > > > I'm at ALE2011 in Berlin. Jason Ayers gave an interesting presentation. He > works for Cincom, a maker of Smalltalk. They wondered what would happ

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-08 Thread Phil Hagelberg
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Brian Marick wrote: > I'm at ALE2011 in Berlin. Jason Ayers gave an interesting presentation. He > works for Cincom, a maker of Smalltalk. They wondered what would happen if 8 > people programmed together on the same problem (instead of one or two). They > set up

Swarming experiment at Conj?

2011-09-08 Thread Brian Marick
TL;DR: I have an idea for an after-hours coding experiment at the Conj. Interested? I'm at ALE2011 in Berlin. Jason Ayers gave an interesting presentation. He works for Cincom, a maker of Smalltalk. They wondered what would happen if 8 people programmed together on the same problem (instead of