Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-27 Thread Rich Hickey
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Four of Seventeen wrote: > > On Jun 27, 6:32 pm, "J. McConnell" wrote: >> On Jun 27, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Four of Seventeen >> wrote: >> > Regardless, it's a security problem that someone other than Rich was >> > able to bring clojure.org down for tens of minutes l

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-27 Thread hank williams
If Rich wants to keep his stuff there because it meets his needs and he is fully aware of what they do and how they do it then all of this is irrelevant. In any case "security risk" is really a overblown term for even the worst case scenario of what could happen to documentation pages. If you are

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-27 Thread Four of Seventeen
On Jun 27, 6:32 pm, "J. McConnell" wrote: > On Jun 27, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Four of Seventeen   > wrote: > > Regardless, it's a security problem that someone other than Rich was > > able to bring clojure.org down for tens of minutes last night at the > > push of a button. > > No, it's not, whatsoe

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-27 Thread J. McConnell
On Jun 27, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Four of Seventeen wrote: > > On Jun 27, 1:53 am, CuppoJava wrote: >> It was a server maintenance for wikispaces.org which is the hosting >> site for the Clojure website. > > But the Clojure website is clojure.org. NOT clojure.wikispaces.org or > something. DNS i

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-27 Thread Four of Seventeen
On Jun 27, 1:53 am, CuppoJava wrote: > It was a server maintenance for wikispaces.org which is the hosting > site for the Clojure website. But the Clojure website is clojure.org. NOT clojure.wikispaces.org or something. It's clearly standing alone, or at least it's supposed to be. Server mainten

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-27 Thread Justin
This if off-topic but I'm wondering- is there any reason (doc ...) returns a URL instead of documentation for special forms? On Jun 27, 12:29 am, ataggart wrote: > On Jun 26, 9:12 pm, Four of Seventeen wrote: > > > Not that it really matters why it is/was down. The API docs going down > > for

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-26 Thread CuppoJava
It was a server maintenance for wikispaces.org which is the hosting site for the Clojure website. Nothing sinister about it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-26 Thread ataggart
On Jun 26, 9:12 pm, Four of Seventeen wrote: > Not that it really matters why it is/was down. The API docs going down > for any amount of time longer than a minute or so is bad bad news. ... > By contrast, in over a decade of usinghttp://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/ > and its predecessors I

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-26 Thread Four of Seventeen
On Jun 26, 11:14 pm, CuppoJava wrote: > Are you sure? It resembles a regular site maintenance to me... It resembles a "regular site maintenance" for some website other than clojure.org. Not that it really matters why it is/was down. The API docs going down for any amount of time longer than a m

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-26 Thread Richard Newman
Clojure.org looks normal to me. I checked /api and the front page. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from ne

Re: The API docs are gone!

2009-06-26 Thread CuppoJava
Are you sure? It resembles a regular site maintenance to me... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new mem

The API docs are gone!

2009-06-26 Thread Four of Seventeen
I just went to check the API docs about something and they're gone! In fact, everything at clojure.org has been trashed. The site has apparently been vandalized. The vandals appear to have replaced every page on the site with some kind of a maintenance page copied from some unrelated site. Probab