Awesome! Well done!
On Monday, August 18, 2014 12:55:23 AM UTC+2, Ashton Kemerling wrote:
>
> I went ahead and wrote it. I'm sure there are some bugs to work out, but
> for now it works in the basic cases. The pullrequest for this feature can
> be located on Solr's github here:
> https://github
I went ahead and wrote it. I'm sure there are some bugs to work out, but
for now it works in the basic cases. The pullrequest for this feature can
be located on Solr's github here:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/85.
--
Ashton
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 6:50:34 PM UTC-6, Alex Mil
Sounds good to me. :)
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:59:54 PM UTC-4, Ashton Kemerling wrote:
>
> I realized that Solr currently provides a lot of language-specific
> serializer options. Currently Ruby, Python, PHP, and javabin(?) are
> options, along with the normal json and xml. Wouldn't it m
I realized that Solr currently provides a lot of language-specific
serializer options. Currently Ruby, Python, PHP, and javabin(?) are
options, along with the normal json and xml. Wouldn't it make a lot of
sense for us to add a transit-json and transit-messagepack options to Solr?
--
Ashton
--
