I'm coming from an imperative background and trying to stay away from
"for loops" to do the task at hand. Given a size, I want to create a
vector of vectors to represent a game board similar to Rich's ants or
Conway's Game of Life (no wrapping necessary for me). A couple of
questions. I will nee
Hi,
Some time back Lau Jensen blogged something like this. Its starts here
http://www.bestinclass.dk/index.clj/2009/10/brians-functional-brain.html
but there are at least two follow ups. It might spark inspiration if you've
not yet read it.
Edmund
On 22 Jul 2010, at 13:37, Rising
On 22 Jul 2010, at 14:37, Rising_Phorce wrote:
I will need to traverse the vectors sequentially but at
each step there will be lots of sequential back and forward tracking.
Arrays would be the natural imperative choice, but the docs recommend
this only for inter-op. So are vectors the best choi
Hi,
On Jul 23, 4:19 pm, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> Instead of (take size (repeat nil)), you can write (replicate size
> nil). You can then make a square board filled with nils with
Or just (repeat size nil). I think replicate was replaced by the two-
arg form of repeat.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You
