Ah! Got what you mean, thanks a lot :)
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:52:39 AM UTC+2, Herwig Hochleitner wrote:
2013/3/25 Ryan areka...@gmail.com javascript:
Thanks for your input Herwig.
When talking to a database, there might already be record and
list-of-records interface, for step 2.
out which is the most idiomatic way to go in a
project I am doing. I've noticed the following pattern in my code and I
started wondering if there is a more clojurish approach to go with it. For
the shake of readability and simplicity, I will provide a pseudo-code that
represents the actual
you implement batching, switch to another DB, etc. without touching the
data processing code.
So I would trust your instincts on this one. :)
--Leif
On Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:24:53 AM UTC-4, Ryan wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to figure out which is the most idiomatic way to go
lets
you implement batching, switch to another DB, etc. without touching the
data processing code.
So I would trust your instincts on this one. :)
--Leif
On Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:24:53 AM UTC-4, Ryan wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to figure out which is the most idiomatic way to go
2013/3/25 Ryan arekand...@gmail.com
Thanks for your input Herwig.
When talking to a database, there might already be record and
list-of-records interface, for step 2.
I didn't fully understand what you meant with that. Can you please
explain?
For example clojure.java.jdbc/insert! [1]
Hello all,
I am trying to figure out which is the most idiomatic way to go in a
project I am doing. I've noticed the following pattern in my code and I
started wondering if there is a more clojurish approach to go with it. For
the shake of readability and simplicity, I will provide a pseudo
instincts on this one. :)
--Leif
On Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:24:53 AM UTC-4, Ryan wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to figure out which is the most idiomatic way to go in a
project I am doing. I've noticed the following pattern in my code and I
started wondering if there is a more clojurish
