Re: clojure-contrib 1.3.0-alpha3 deployed to build.clojure.org

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Ossareh
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 14:56, Benny Tsai wrote: > My guess is that they're being deprecated in favor of their > counterparts in clojure.core: > > string -> clojure.string > io -> clojure.java.io Ah right, I think I remember that now. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subs

Re: clojure-contrib 1.3.0-alpha3 deployed to build.clojure.org

2010-11-22 Thread Benny Tsai
My guess is that they're being deprecated in favor of their counterparts in clojure.core: string -> clojure.string io -> clojure.java.io On Nov 22, 2:49 pm, Michael Ossareh wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 06:50, Stuart Sierra > wrote: > > >http://build.clojure.org/releases/org/clojure/contrib/

Re: clojure-contrib 1.3.0-alpha3 deployed to build.clojure.org

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Ossareh
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 06:50, Stuart Sierra wrote: > http://build.clojure.org/releases/org/clojure/contrib/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from n

Re: clojure-contrib 1.3.0-alpha3 deployed to build.clojure.org

2010-11-12 Thread Sean Corfield
Thanx Stuart. That gives me the guidance I was looking for. On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > I think it depends. If it's a build/deployment-related issue, probably > the alpha releases. If it looks like a bug, try the latest Clojure > source from github and report the Git c

Re: clojure-contrib 1.3.0-alpha3 deployed to build.clojure.org

2010-11-12 Thread Stuart Sierra
On Nov 8, 5:14 pm, Sean Corfield wrote: > I meant more from the point of view of providing feedback to the > Clojure team. If someone is comfortable developing against a fairly > bleeding edge release, is it more valuable to the Clojure team to get > feedback on the specific alpha builds or to get

Re: clojure-contrib 1.3.0-alpha3 deployed to build.clojure.org

2010-11-08 Thread Sean Corfield
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > Not sure I understand the question.  If you're designing a library, > you probably want to test on both. I meant more from the point of view of providing feedback to the Clojure team. If someone is comfortable developing against a fairly blee

Re: clojure-contrib 1.3.0-alpha3 deployed to build.clojure.org

2010-11-08 Thread Stuart Sierra
Hi Sean, Not sure I understand the question. If you're designing a library, you probably want to test on both. -S On Nov 7, 3:57 pm, Sean Corfield wrote: > Thanx Stuart! > > As a general point of protocol, would the Clojure team prefer folks > test against the Alpha builds or the (master) SNA

Re: clojure-contrib 1.3.0-alpha3 deployed to build.clojure.org

2010-11-07 Thread Sean Corfield
Thanx Stuart! As a general point of protocol, would the Clojure team prefer folks test against the Alpha builds or the (master) SNAPSHOT builds? Sean On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > http://build.clojure.org/releases/org/clojure/contrib/ -- You received this message beca

clojure-contrib 1.3.0-alpha3 deployed to build.clojure.org

2010-11-07 Thread Stuart Sierra
http://build.clojure.org/releases/org/clojure/contrib/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first po