On Monday, 17 December 2012 23:44:12 UTC, Christopher Meiklejohn wrote:
>
> [...]I'd like to offer to step up and maintain clojure-contrib.graph,
> mainly starting with converting the defstructs over to defrecords [...]
>
Out of interest - why use records rather than plain maps?
--
You receive
I believe Sean Corfield has helped several of the older contrib libraries get
migrated to the newer ones, and either knows the process better, or knows who
to ask. Sean?
Andy
On Dec 18, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Christopher Meiklejohn wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Thanks for the response. I've signed the
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the response. I've signed the CA and mailed it off. I'm also
hoping to keep this under the clojure.* namespace. Would the process moving
forward be to create a separate repo containing just the components I'll be
working on moving forward to break it out of the large clo
If you want it to remain a Clojure contrib library with a clojure.* namespace,
you'll need to sign a Clojure CA to be able to make contributions to it.
http://clojure.org/contributing
If you want to make it a project on Github or somewhere else, you would
probably need to keep the existing
Hi there,
I'm inquiring regarding the clojure-contrib migration process. I'd like to
offer to step up and maintain clojure-contrib.graph, mainly starting with
converting the defstructs over to defrecords so I can start playing around
in ClojureScript with this library. What's the process movi
