Thanks Alex, clojure.lang.Compiler/demunge is just what I wanted.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Alex Miller wrote:
> There is a demunge function in clojure.lang.Compiler. It's not foolproof
> as the munging is not unambiguously reversible.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are su
Yes. Specifically, - and _ both map to _ so foo-bar and foo_bar generate the
same class name. So don't do that.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new mem
On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 7:28:32 PM UTC-4, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> There is a demunge function in clojure.lang.Compiler. It's not foolproof
> as the munging is not unambiguously reversible.
If the munging process loses information, isn't there a (theoretical, at
least) risk of name collis
There is a demunge function in clojure.lang.Compiler. It's not foolproof as the
munging is not unambiguously reversible.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts fro
Hi Dave,
All the various stacktrace-prettifying libraries (clj-stacktrace, Aviso
pretty etc) all do this - check their code out for some examples.
Cheers,
Colin
On 23 August 2015 at 01:07, Dave Tenny wrote:
> I wanted to write a function like this:
>
> (defn fn-name-info
> "Given a function,
I wanted to write a function like this:
(defn fn-name-info
"Given a function, try to deduce the function name and clojure namespace
by looking
at the function's java class name and decoding stuff. Return a vector of
name, namespace strings,
or nil if we can't find anything.
For exa
