Thanks, I see now.
Just want to stress that it is important to have a single point of
diving into the documentation. And it's best of all to be on the
http://clojure.org , not just http://dev.clojure.org.
IMHO with the call to community to move to 1.3 the current outdated
clojure.org can fight ba
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Fogus wrote:
> Good catch. That was my fault. It's now nested under the Core page
> in the same space.
Thanx for the swift update - appreciated!
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worlds
> (it doesn't help that this is now a child page of Release.Next
> Planning which now refers to Clojure 1.4!)
Good catch. That was my fault. It's now nested under the Core page
in the same space.
> Improving documentation looks to be a focus of Clojure
> 1.4:http://dev.clojure.org/display/desi
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Sergey Didenko wrote:
> Clearly (the main) clojure.org is not the main documentation source
> for 1.3. To prove it - try to find the mention of "Factory function
> taking a map", e.g. map->MyRecord there.
The defrecord improvements seem to be covered here.
http://
My last mail remain unnoticed, so I'll clarify the question:
Clearly (the main) clojure.org is not the main documentation source
for 1.3. To prove it - try to find the mention of "Factory function
taking a map", e.g. map->MyRecord there.
So what is the best search strategy right now to find the c
Is the README file from Clojure on github the best 1.3 documentation
for the moment?
For example, I can't find a mention of "Factory function taking a map"
, e.g. map->MyRecord on the main clojure.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
T
