Re: error-on-reflection

2013-12-10 Thread Phillip Lord
>> I know about *warn-on-reflection* but is there anyway that I can get an >> error-on-reflection instead? >> >> I've been type hinting my application (50% done and yes it goes faster >> now), and it's a bit painful. What I would really want is to have a uni

Re: error-on-reflection

2013-12-10 Thread Phillip Lord
arn-on-reflection* but is there anyway that I can get >> an error-on-reflection instead? > > I don't think so. > >> I've been type hinting my application (50% done and yes it goes faster >> now), and it's a bit painful. What I would really want is to have a

Re: error-on-reflection

2013-12-09 Thread John D. Hume
Are you aware of `lein check`? We have our some of our CI builds wired to fail if that finds anything. On Dec 9, 2013 4:12 AM, "Phillip Lord" wrote: > > I know about *warn-on-reflection* but is there anyway that I can get an > error-on-reflection instead? > >

Re: error-on-reflection

2013-12-09 Thread Tassilo Horn
phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > I know about *warn-on-reflection* but is there anyway that I can get > an error-on-reflection instead? I don't think so. > I've been type hinting my application (50% done and yes it goes faster > now), and it's

error-on-reflection

2013-12-09 Thread Phillip Lord
I know about *warn-on-reflection* but is there anyway that I can get an error-on-reflection instead? I've been type hinting my application (50% done and yes it goes faster now), and it's a bit painful. What I would really want is to have a unit test which fails if reflection is used