Re: idiomatic list-ify

2012-03-09 Thread Brandon Harvey
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 2:19:37 PM UTC-8, mefesto wrote: > > If `x` is a list then is the call to `(apply list x)` necessary? > Yes, meant to take that out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojur

Re: idiomatic list-ify

2012-03-09 Thread Sanel Zukan
Not sure what kind of input you can get, but apply-ing list only on strings would decompose them, so your function can be written as: (defn ls [x] (cond (string? x) (apply list (list x)) :else (apply list x as '(apply list nil)' will yield '(). Or, you can write i

Re: idiomatic list-ify

2012-03-08 Thread Allen Johnson
> So I've ended up writing the function with a conditional, like so.  Is there > a tidier way? > > (defn ls [x] (cond (list? x) (apply list x) >                    (nil? x)  '() >                    :else (list x))) If `x` is a list then is the call to `(apply list x)` necessary? (defn ls [x] (

idiomatic list-ify

2012-03-08 Thread Brandon Harvey
Hi, I'm seeking a small & idiomatic function that will take input and ensure it's wrapped in a list. If nil, I'd like the list to be empty. If the input is already a list, I don't want to wrap it in another list layer. So: "hi" => ("hi") nil=> () ("hi") => ("hi") (list '("hi"))