On Mar 13, 3:35 pm, "Stephen C. Gilardi" wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
>
> > Hi Allen,
> > Sorry I haven't kept up with this. I think, though, that it's best to
> > have it as a standalone library in clojure-contrib, so that people can
> > use it with other testing
On Mar 13, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
Hi Allen,
Sorry I haven't kept up with this. I think, though, that it's best to
have it as a standalone library in clojure-contrib, so that people can
use it with other testing frameworks if they want to.
-Stuart
Allen,
I see you have a contr
Hi Allen,
Sorry I haven't kept up with this. I think, though, that it's best to
have it as a standalone library in clojure-contrib, so that people can
use it with other testing frameworks if they want to.
-Stuart
On Mar 13, 3:20 pm, Allen Rohner wrote:
> > > Any other options out there?
>
> I po
>
> > Any other options out there?
I posted a patch for test-is a while ago that never made it in, and I
don't know why.
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/883d4833f869f764/47a45325c8f29599?lnk=gst&q=test-is+expect+patch#47a45325c8f29599
The patch handles creating stub fun
test-expect actually only depends on test-is for its own tests, and
I'm planning on breaking the tests out into their own file. I thought
it was an interesting idea having the tests and code in the same file,
but in practice it ended up being less attractive than anticipated.
- Matt
On Mar 13,
Hi folks - are there any frameworks out there for mocking?
Stubbing functions is pretty straightforward (and I see that fact comes with
a stubbing function built in), but I'd really like something that can do
mocking and mock expectations - something similar to stub, but with checking
that the stub
