On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> You can get a doctoring
D**n you autocorrect! :)
You can get a docstring...
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
"Perfection is the enemy of the g
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
>> Cute, but that makes giving it a docstring, pre- and postconditions,
>> and similar things a pain.
>
> You can get a doctoring and even arglists (for code assist in your IDE
> and for
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
> Cute, but that makes giving it a docstring, pre- and postconditions,
> and similar things a pain.
You can get a doctoring and even arglists (for code assist in your IDE
and for clojure.repl/doc):
(def ^{:arglists '([pred coll]) } separate
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Alan Malloy wrote:
> (def separate (juxt filter remove)).
Cute, but that makes giving it a docstring, pre- and postconditions,
and similar things a pain.
> It's in old-contrib, I think in clojure.contrib.seq-utils or
> something. Obviously not recommended for use
(def separate (juxt filter remove)).
It's in old-contrib, I think in clojure.contrib.seq-utils or
something. Obviously not recommended for use in new programs.
On Feb 11, 3:49 pm, Cedric Greevey wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Jules wrote:
> > There is a standard library function for
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Jules wrote:
> There is a standard library function for this: separate.
Not according to clooj's tab completion,
http://clojure.org/cheatsheet, or http://clojure.github.com/clojure/
-- none of those match any library function to the substring "sep",
and the third
There is a standard library function for this: separate. For example
(separate even? coll) returns two results in a vector: (filter even?
coll) and (filter odd? coll).
On Feb 10, 9:05 pm, Manuel Paccagnella
wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 11:40 PM, Steve Miner wrote:
>
> > filter is lazy so it won't actua
On 02/09/2012 11:40 PM, Steve Miner wrote:
filter is lazy so it won't actually do the work unless the values are needed.
To get a reasonable time, you need to use the result for some computation. Try
something like this:
(defn sum-all [m] (reduce + (apply map + (vals m
(time (sum-all (s
filter is lazy so it won't actually do the work unless the values are needed.
To get a reasonable time, you need to use the result for some computation. Try
something like this:
(defn sum-all [m] (reduce + (apply map + (vals m
(time (sum-all (separate-nums (range 1
On Feb 9, 201
Sorry for what I guess is a pretty basic question. I've written for
practice a simple function that takes a sequence of numbers and returns
a map with the odd and even ones. No big deal:
(defn separate-nums [coll]
(hash-map :even (filter even? coll) :odd (filter odd? coll)))
But I th
10 matches
Mail list logo
