On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 2:44 pm, "Michael Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there any particular reason for the reversal of the order of
>> arguments between nth and take-nth?
>
> Short answer - take-nth is more like take.
>
> Long
On Nov 8, 2:44 pm, "Michael Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any particular reason for the reversal of the order of
> arguments between nth and take-nth?
Short answer - take-nth is more like take.
Longer answer:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/8b2c8dc96b39d
Is there any particular reason for the reversal of the order of
arguments between nth and take-nth? I would have expected something
like:
clojure/nth
([n coll])
clojure/take-nth
([index coll]) ([index coll not-found])
or else:
clojure/nth
([coll n])
clojure/take-nth
([coll index]) ([coll ind
