I also found it useful to define my own clojure.core. This is because
i wanted swap! and reset! to work on my AtomHash. So i did something
like this, using clj-nstools.
http://code.google.com/p/clj-nstools/
ns+ is sort of slow for large projects, but im sure that can be
improved.
(ns clj.core
(:
The problem is that defrecord explicitly defines the interface you are
trying to implement, so you are effectively attempting to declare the
interface twice. And since clojure.lang.seqable isnt a protocol, you
cant redefine it with extend. So, you will have to rewrite the
defrecord macro or similar
On Feb 5, 5:51 pm, Kees-Jochem Wehrmeijer wrote:
> Well, my idea was for the type to hold a datastore query (Google App
> Engine). At the moment I'm using a map for this. To get the results
> from the query I have a function run-query that takes the map and
> returns a seq based on an Iterable. I
> Why do you want to override seq? The only reason that I can think of
> is that you are implementing some sort of custom data type. If that is
> the case, you should be using deftype instead; defrecord is a protocol-
> aware drop in replacement for normal maps.
Well, my idea was for the type to h
Why do you want to override seq? The only reason that I can think of
is that you are implementing some sort of custom data type. If that is
the case, you should be using deftype instead; defrecord is a protocol-
aware drop in replacement for normal maps.
On Feb 5, 2:58 pm, Kees-Jochem Wehrmeijer
Hi all,
I'm playing around with defprotocol and defrecord and I ran into a
problem when trying to provide my own seq method. I try to create a
record like so:
(defrecord Foo [bar]
clojure.lang.Seqable
(seq [this] (seq this)))
but I get an error:
error: java.lang.ClassFormatError: Duplicate me
