On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Kevin Downey redc...@gmail.com wrote:
doall doesn't recurse, so you are not realizing the lazy-seq, you want
something like [msg (doall sig-strs)]
Thank you Kevin! When Elango said my suggestion didn't work, I was
puzzled. Now it makes sense!
--
Sean A Corfield
And yep, Kevin's change works. Looking into reducers + I/O sounds
interesting, I'll definitely check it out, thanks!
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Kevin Downey redc...@gmail.com wrote:
doall doesn't recurse, so
Hi everyone,
I had a function that reads the contents of a file (in this case, it
represents a license) and then verifies the contents.
As I started to expand the code for verifying, it made sense to break the
function up into a function for file parsing and a function for
verification. The
Much simpler, although I'm still seeing the following exception, unless I
keep the form (str [msg sig-strs]):
IOException Stream closed java.io.BufferedReader.ensureOpen
(BufferedReader.java:115)
Any ideas why?
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.comwrote:
Just
doall doesn't recurse, so you are not realizing the lazy-seq, you want
something like [msg (doall sig-strs)]
if you are looking to play around with io stuff, I recommend looking in to
using reducers for io, they allow you to sort of invert control, keeping
the nice property of with-open always
